November 19, 2003

Uh-oh.:
Which is better: one or two?
One or two? One or two?

posted by forksclovetofu to culture at 08:19 PM - 7 comments

Injuries are bad, why try to categorize them as better or worse? The only question is how long the recovery will take, if one can recover, and if inflicted by another, is it a crime and will the perp be punished. And I know you're new, the linkfests are fun, but the last set just doesn't belong.

posted by billsaysthis at 08:40 PM on November 19, 2003

Injuries are bad...but this is quite an impressive list of them. Stab wound? Collapsed lung? No Vick for the rest of the season? God. What if while typing this I hurt my pinky and couldn't post for 3 months? Whatever would the rest of you do?

posted by vito90 at 09:30 PM on November 19, 2003

Truth be told, I just had an optometry session today; hence the link format. None of these look like life endangering injuries but maybe i was a bit lighthearted toward a stabbing. My bad. vito we'd trade you for a younger model. Maybe a fourteen year old.

posted by forksclovetofu at 10:43 PM on November 19, 2003

Vick. Vick. I took Vick and Michael Bennett first two rounds of my fantasy league draft. So far, about a dozen carries out of Bennett is all I've gotten. Arrrgh.

posted by tieguy at 07:29 AM on November 20, 2003

I prefer number one, but occasionally I go number two.

posted by rocketman at 08:32 AM on November 20, 2003

You should have used some link for the Raiders, since they put four players on IR yesterday and are apparently going to lose four more (including the already IR-listed Romo) for THG suspensions.

posted by billsaysthis at 10:53 AM on November 20, 2003

The Raiders deserve their own link. My boy was playing his season of Madden '04 last night and the cyber-ticker informed him that the Raiders were at 11-1. Who knew?

posted by forksclovetofu at 01:34 PM on November 20, 2003

You're not logged in. Please log in or register.