First to Worst.: ESPN.com's Page 2 ranks all of the World Series in order, from #1 (1991; Twins beat Braves 4 games to 3) to #100 (1994; no World Series due to players' strike). [Complete list inside.]
posted by kirkaracha to baseball at 02:14 PM - 7 comments
I'm no baseball fan, but shouldn't the Jays/Phillies series be higher ranked than the Jays/Braves series? It seems like the far more memorable of the two.
posted by mkn at 03:10 PM on October 18, 2003
A series that goes to an 11-inning game seven is #33? like, um, WTF? Behind several six game series and even one five game series? Sure, no one /watched/ any of the games, but TV ratings != quality series.
posted by tieguy at 03:15 PM on October 18, 2003
I wonder if Marlins-Indians is low-rated because of the firesale the Marlins had just days after the final out was recorded in Game Seven. I remember it being a pretty memorable series. I'm also intrigued that the 1960 series places only 18th, given how wacky a Series it was and how until 1993 it was the only Series to end on a walk-off home run. Mazeroski's shot is one of the greatest highlights in baseball history; is there any comparable play from, say, Blue Jays/Braves in 1992, which outranks 1960 on the list?
posted by Jaquandor at 03:35 PM on October 18, 2003
I think the Jays/Braves World Series got a higher rank than the Jays/Phillies series because it was the first one to involve a team based OUTSIDE the USA. They made a BIG deal about it at the time (and the upside-down flag incident).
posted by grum@work at 05:55 PM on October 18, 2003
Heh, I wonder where this years will rank....on the surface I would imagine pretty low. Ironic that it could have been probably the highest TV ratings world series ever (if cubs made it) to astronomical TV ratings (if it were Cubs v Sox). Instead they got Yankees v Marlins...zzzzzzzzzzz. You know Fox isnt happy. I say this year is in the 90's on the list of 101 (without a game being played even).
posted by pivo at 09:49 PM on October 18, 2003
Doh, just realized this comment would have been better served in the previous thread. That's what i get for reading top down i guess :P
posted by pivo at 09:59 PM on October 18, 2003
posted by kirkaracha at 02:17 PM on October 18, 2003