- 03:50 AM
- 12/04/24
Hey, the BBC is censored in China, so I can't read the article. Does anybody have a different link or story on the same topic?
posted by rpmurphy81 at 10:45 AM on June 03, 2006
Yes, signing Bush would have made the Texans offense amazing, but defense is still more important to longterm success. Indy had an offense that could win most shootouts, but not all, and with the most talented O-unit in the game they did nothing in the playoffs without a defense and Dwight Freeney. Although I'm sure they would have loved to keep a player with Edge's talent, they won't be sweating too much. They'll just stick another RB with a generally short shelf-life into the mold and keep winning games. Good DE's wreck opposing gameplans and are very hard to comebye. True, Bush would have been a good pick, comparable to Sander's in terms of talent and lack of SuperBowl wins. William's provide's a defensive cornerstone to a unit with nothing, and he will play longer for less money.
posted by rpmurphy81 at 07:34 AM on April 29, 2006
I've been teaching in China for 5 months now, and ping-pong is NOT a good way to let out your frustrations. I miss football and hockey so much it hurts, especially with the Superbowl coming. But seeing those clips of Stevens crunching people sure helps, so thanks for the video. I have to clean off my computer screen and find a tube sock or something now...
posted by rpmurphy81 at 09:15 AM on February 04, 2006
Chelsea FC: Right, just to be clear we're buying every single good player who will take our dosh
Thanks Tex.