- 10:34 AM
- 11/24/24
Bond tested positive, and the HOF would vote him in, but not the Mac? There may be suspicion, but with out proof, are we not innocent until proven guilty? Key word 'PROVEN'. Court of public opinion differs of course. I would hope the HOF would not allow themselves to look like a bunch of asses by letting a known roider like Bonds in the hall, and not Mac. If that’s the case, Rafi Palm is a shoo-in.
posted by KG4MVP at 03:34 PM on September 29, 2005
And the witchhunt continues
Just so I am clear, you’re saying that a known riod user, who has broken MBL record, should be allowed into the HOF, and a player in which there is no proof? or admission? I would hope not, and would like to think that there is still a level of rational thinking in this country that is still capable of seeing the obvious. Players in MBL history have shed blood, sweat, and tears to accomplish their achievements. These Hall Of Famers need to stand up and denounce roid use, and those who have been 'proven' to have used them. As dose every fan of the national pastime. Even if it means shuting Bonds out, hell, they did it to Rose for gambling. Whether he threw games or not, still not 'proven' Different topics, but cheating is cheating.