- 02:28 PM
- 11/21/24
well Greg, it sounds good, but if you'll join us in reality. Unless BB is an optometrist then his testimony on his eyesight is an opinion. Not A FACT. Unless you have testimony from an optometrist, who examined BB prior to him taking roids and while he was on steroids stating there was an increase in his vision, then you don't actually have proof his eyesight was better.
posted by tlach at 10:34 PM on March 07, 2006
Gregy what he says and scientific data says are two different things. His so called ability to track the ball better was probably mentally induced and no effect to the drug. And on a separate note to nullify his records would be the equivalent to ex post facto. It wasn't a crime, by mlb standards, at the time of the act. Meaning it would be unjust to punish him now.
posted by tlach at 10:01 PM on March 07, 2006
True, but if you don't get wood on the ball, it doesn't matter how much power you have.
posted by tlach at 09:42 PM on March 07, 2006
Not a Barry fan, but he put the bat on the ball. Last time I checked steroids don't increase vision.
posted by tlach at 08:45 PM on March 07, 2006
Shit, fan. Fan, shit.
He's yet to make a good argument grum, but thanks for the laugh